Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Keynes on Newton


Keynes was one of many dignitaries selected to speak about Isaac Newton on the 300th anniversary of his birth, in 1942, I'm assuming because of his painstaking efforts to track down and reacquire Newton's papers and return them to Cambridge. Keynes read through and reflected on these papers, and in many cases he was the first to have read them since Newton himself. The war delayed the event, and by the time it was held in the summer of 1946, Keynes had passed away. However, he did leave the speech he was intending to deliver, entitled "Newton, the Man".

Yesterday's exchange on science reminded me of it because of one line in the piece that I was familiar with, that "Newton was not the first of the age of reason. He was the last of the magicians." So last night I read it - it's a very interesting read. Here are some good passages:

*****
"In the eighteenth century and since, Newton came to be thought of as the first and greatest of the modern age of scientists, a rationalist, one who taught us to think on the lines of cold and untinctured reason.

I do not see him in this light. I do not think that any one who has pored over the contents of that box which he packed up when he finally left Cambridge in 1696 and which, though partly dispersed, have come down to us, can see him like that. Newton was not the first of the age of reason. He was the last of the magicians, the last of the Babylonians and Sumerians, the last great mind which looked out on the visible and intellectual world with the same eyes as those who began to build our intellectual inheritance rather less than 10,000 years ago. Isaac Newton, a posthumous child bom with no father on Christmas Day, 1642, was the last wonderchild to whom the Magi could do sincere and appropriate homage."

*****

"I believe that the clue to his mind is to be found in his unusual powers of continuous concentrated introspection. A case can be made out, as it also can with Descartes, for regarding him as an accomplished experimentalist. Nothing can be more charming than the tales of his mechanical contrivances when he was a boy. There are his telescopes and his optical experiments, These were essential accomplishments, part of his unequalled all-round technique, but not, I am sure, his peculiar gift, especially amongst his contemporaries. His peculiar gift was the power of holding continuously in his mind a purely mental problem until he had seen straight through it. I fancy his pre-eminence is due to his muscles of intuition being the strongest and most enduring with which a man has ever been gifted."

*****

"There is the story of how he informed Halley of one of his most fundamental discoveries of planetary motion. 'Yes,' replied Halley, 'but how do you know that? Have you proved it?' Newton was taken aback - 'Why, I've known it for years', he replied. 'If you'll give me a few days, I'll certainly find you a proof of it' - as in due course he did."

*****

"His experiments were always, I suspect, a means, not of discovery, but always of verifying what he knew already.

Why do I call him a magician? Because he looked on the whole universe and all that is in it as a riddle, as a secret which could be read by applying pure thought to certain evidence, certain mystic clues which God had laid about the world to allow a sort of philosopher's treasure hunt to the esoteric brotherhood. He believed that these clues were to be found partly in the evidence of the heavens and in the constitution of elements (and that is what gives the false suggestion of his being an experimental natural philosopher), but also partly in certain papers and traditions handed down by the brethren in an unbroken chain back to the original cryptic revelation in Babylonia. He regarded the universe as a cryptogram set by the Almighty - just as he himself wrapt the discovery of the calculus in a cryptogram when he communicated with Leibniz. By pure thought, by concentration of mind, the riddle, he believed, would be revealed to the initiate.
He did read the riddle of the heavens. And he believed that by the same powers of his introspective imagination he would read the riddle of the Godhead, the riddle of past and future events divinely fore-ordained, the riddle of the elements and their constitution from an original undifferentiated first matter, the riddle of health and of immortality. All would be revealed to him if only he could persevere to the end, uninterrupted, by himself, no one coming into the room, reading, copying, testing-all by himself, no interruption for God's sake, no disclosure, no discordant breakings in or criticism, with fear and shrinking as he assailed these half-ordained, half-forbidden things, creeping back into the bosom of the Godhead as into his mother's womb. 'Voyaging through strange seas of thought alone', not as Charles Lamb 'a fellow who believed nothing unless it was as clear as the three sides of a triangle'."
*****

"As one broods over these queer collections, it seems easier to understand - with an understanding which is not, I hope, distorted in the other direction - this strange spirit, who was tempted by the Devil to believe at the time when within these walls he was solving so much, that he could reach all the secrets of God and Nature by the pure power of mind Copernicus and Faustus in one."
*****
I suggest reading the piece in full. I think it's fairly common knowledge that Newton dabbled a lot in alchemy. Evan, you'll be interested in knowing that he also put a lot effort into thinking through theological points, eventually coming to a personal Arianism and other assorted heresies. He is a very interesting and conflicted guy, and it makes sense really. He lived in the seventeenth century, after all. What's truly remarkable is the coexistence of all these currents in Newton.

3 comments:

  1. I suggest the classic: Thomas, _Religion and the Decline of Magic: Studies in Popular Beliefs in Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century England,_ 1971

    ReplyDelete
  2. On the religious issue, there was an article in Scottish Journal of Theology last year about Newton's interaction with Locke over Locke's work on the epistle to the Romans, which included transcription of some of the relevant manuscript fragments... "Newton, Locke and the Trinity: Sir Isaac's comments on Locke's: A Paraphrase and Notes on the Epistle of St Paul to the Romans"

    ReplyDelete
  3. Per our earlier conversation on De Gaulle: http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/the_tls/article7164553.ece

    ReplyDelete

All anonymous comments will be deleted. Consistent pseudonyms are fine.